<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Self-Hosting on StackNotes</title><link>https://stacknotes.co.uk/categories/self-hosting/</link><description>Recent content in Self-Hosting on StackNotes</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-GB</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 22:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://stacknotes.co.uk/categories/self-hosting/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Immich vs PhotoPrism: the library model decides which one you keep</title><link>https://stacknotes.co.uk/articles/immich-vs-photoprism/</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stacknotes.co.uk/articles/immich-vs-photoprism/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The short version: PhotoPrism indexes a folder you already own and leaves it alone. Immich takes a copy, renames it to a UUID and keeps the meaning in Postgres. Both handled the same 205 files; the difference shows up the day you try to leave.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Pick Immich if the library is mostly phone photos from several people and you want the app to be the product. Pick PhotoPrism if you already have a photo folder with a structure you trust and you want software that reads it instead of absorbing it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>